2023年7月24日 · According to Cochrane (1), a systematic review attempts to identify, appraise and synthesize all the empirical evidence to answer a specific research question. Thus, a systematic review is where you might find the most relevant, adequate, and current information regarding a specific topic.

It is easy to confuse systematic reviews and meta-analyses. A systematic review is an objective, reproducible method to find answers to a certain research question, by collecting all available studies related to that question and reviewing and analyzing their results.

Systematic review and meta-analysis are two terms that you might see used interchangeably. Each term refers to research about research, but there are important differences! A systematic review is a piece of work that asks a research question and then answers it by summarising the evidence that meets a set of pre-specified criteria.

Systematic reviews appraise the validity of the results and findings of the collected studies in an impartial way. They define clear objectives and reproducible methodologies. What is a Meta-analysis? This form of research relies on combining statistical results from …

5 天之前 · DEFINITION 2: A systematic review is an overview of primary studies that used explicit and reproducible methods. A meta-analysis is a mathematical synthesis of the results of two or more primary studies that addressed the same hypothesis in the same way.

2016年9月8日 · What is a meta-analysis? Sometimes the results of all of the studies found and included in a systematic review can be summarized and expressed as an overall result. This is known as a meta-analysis. The overall outcome of the studies is often more conclusive than the results of individual studies.

Systematic review and meta-analysis is a way of summarizing research evidence, which is generally the best form of evidence, and hence positioned at the top of the hierarchy of evidence. Systematic reviews can be very useful decision-making tools for primary care/family physicians.