2016年4月27日 · Hegel provides great examples how a historical narrative is constructed by humans, and so it is purely ideological. However understanding that people use dialectical thinking to construct historical narratives, gives a Hegelian scholar ability to trace this logic, and expose it's arbitrary nature.

To understand Hegelian dialectic, you first need to understand what Hegel calls the "abstract" or the "positive" or the "understanding". This is when we put forward a certain conception or perspective on some matter, and we take this conception or perspective to be the definitive statement on the nature of that matter.

Hegel does refer to this as a "dialectic," but like I said, he has a number of methods that interact with each other. In "Absolute Knowing" (805), Hegel suggests that the difference between the Phenomenology and the Encyclopedia/Science of Logic is that, in the Phenomenology , we have a gap between knowledge and truth, one that is continually ...

2021年8月16日 · Marx did not understand Hegel's dialectic as "thesis-antithesis-synthesis," and many Marxists criticized that reading of Hegel. The "triad" stuff is an old misreading and comes from before Marx's time. Check out the introductions to The Shorter & Greater Logics by Hegel. Some of the most clear explanations of the "dialectic" can be found in there.

Abstract, dialectic, speculative is the correct formulation, and it just means that everything is pushed the point of self-contradiction, yet as Hegel explains in the Logic, he thinks it is self-evident that the negative is just as much positive, and he calls the method based on this logical principle the only true method. He also says at the ...

2021年7月10日 · If you want to formalize Hegel's dialectic into three abstract moments, they would be positive, negative, sublative, or abstract, dialectical, speculative. The negative/dialectical moment isn't an "antithesis" in the sense of a "conflicting idea", but rather is the critique of, the tension within, the internal contradiction of, the breakdown of ...

2016年1月31日 · Hegel's dialectic, Marx says, inappropriately concerns "the process of the human brain"; it focuses on ideas. Hegel's thought is in fact sometimes called dialectical idealism. Marx believed that dialectics should deal not with the mental world of ideas but with "the material world," the world of production and other economic activity."

2017年4月8日 · Hegel thinks this is how the history of the world and of ideas progresses. Other useful threads: here, on the master-slave dialectic (still simplified, but less simplified than the version I've presented here). here, on the master-slave dialectic (Read u/PrurientLuxurient's comments — more technical, more faithful to the text).

2022年1月5日 · Hegel doesn't even structure the dialectic as a triad, and doing so limits one's understanding of his ontology. Well, dialectic is one moment in Hegel's triadic division of the moments of logic. See Encyclopaedia Logic §79-82. There certainly are triadic structures throughout Hegel's work, including, quite explicitly, this one.

2016年11月29日 · Topic 2: Hegel’s Master-Slave Dialectic Introduction: Briefly introduce the reader to the paper’s topic, structure, and conclusions. Part One: What are some of the problems that Hegel’s “Lordship and Bondage” passage (§§178-196) addresses? Pick one of these problems and explain how the “Lordship and Bondage” section responds to it.