2011年12月21日 · abusementpark: noncontact lap splices are permitted subjected to the limit of 6" or one-fifth the splice length whichever is less. The commentary clarifies that most research …

2012年3月12日 · When should equation 12-1 be used? The way that I interpret ACI 318-11, the table in 12.2.2 can always be used in-lieu of equation 12-1. The result from table 12.2.2 are …

2014年3月11日 · The ACI code gave a provision on structural integrity to perimeter beams is to splice continuous top bars at mid span and splice continuous bottom bars at or near supports. …

2014年10月5日 · (ACI 318-11) 12.15.3 — When bars of different size are lap spliced in tension, splice length shall be the larger of ld of larger bar and tension lap splice length of smaller bar. …

2014年6月26日 · When I detailed it, then double checked it, I noticed that for a #5 bar, the tension lap splice length for CMU is less than the Class B tension lap splice length for the concrete. …

2006年11月17日 · Then my answer is, yes, it does constitute a "Lap Splice". However, it does not meet the requirements of a structurally acceptable and functional "lap splice" as defined by …

2002年11月15日 · In Section 12.15.1 in the notes under the splice requirements of 1.3(ld) for Class B splices it states, "where ld is calculated in accordance with 12.2 to develop fy without …

2010年4月15日 · Agree with KootK on "anywhere" but a continuous bar is inherently more capable than a splice in concrete - just because. Section 7.13 deals with integrity …

2023年4月14日 · Oh yeah, that part of it is certainly a lap splice, I thought you were talking about the length into the footing. Sorry for the confusion. Hey dik, if you're not aware the Reinforcing …

2002年7月3日 · I am reviewing rebar detail drawings and noticed that two bars that are lapped have differnt spacing. There is a #5@12 lapped with a #6@18. From the 12" and 18" spacing, …