Protocols reduce bias in the systematic review process by making any changes in decisions transparent. Protocols allow editors, peer reviewers and readers to judge whether you made decisions after the ...
For Systematic Reviews of observational studies ... we will not require the artwork to be resubmitted following the peer review process/if your paper is accepted for publication (if applicable).
Introduction While many interventions aim to raise measles vaccination coverage in low-income and middle-income countries ...
The course will include tips and techniques for managing the systematic review process efficiently. Sessions will be delivered by staff from the Division of Population Health who are highly ...
An updated systematic review is justified on the basis of further evidence ... identified and screened all articles for inclusion, although this process was checked at several stages by a second ...
The tool is completed in 3 phases: (1) assess relevance (optional), (2) identify concerns with the review process and (3) judge risk of bias. Phase 2 covers four domains through which bias may be ...
This course aims to introduce participants to the methodology of systematic reviews and meta-analysis. It is taught by a team of systematic reviewers, research synthesis methodologists, information ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results